White Paper - Beyond Personal Responsibility: What Are We Helping to Create?
Author: Vlad Duțescu, EIA SP, ITCA P, ESIA, President EMCC România, September 2026
Coaching, mentoring and team coaching are fundamentally developmental professions. We help people become more aware, capable, resilient and effective. But there is a question we may need to ask more often:
What if the problem we are trying to solve does not sit only with the individual?
The new thought-leadership paper Beyond Personal Responsibility: Coaching, Mentoring and Team Coaching as Practices of Shared Generative Responsibility explores the tension between personal agency and the systems in which people work and live. Its central proposition is that development should not simply help people fit the systems they inhabit; it should also increase their capacity to understand, influence and responsibly shape what those systems become.
The paper starts from a familiar organisational pattern. Burnout becomes a resilience issue. Contradictory priorities become a time-management problem. Structural barriers become a confidence problem. Dysfunctional collaboration becomes a communication-skills problem. Each intervention may be valuable, but when individual development becomes the only intervention, coaching can unintentionally help people adapt to conditions that themselves need attention.
The alternative proposed is Shared Generative Responsibility: responsibility understood as relational, systemic and differentiated rather than located exclusively in either the individual or “the organisation.” People shape systems while simultaneously being shaped by them, and responsibility should therefore reflect differences in agency, role, power, resources and foreseeable impact.
This leads to five practical disciplines:
Question the boundary before assigning responsibility.
Do not individualise what is systemic.
Do not externalise what is yours.
Do not equalise responsibility where power is unequal.
Do not optimise the present by externalising consequences into the future.
The paper then explores what this perspective might mean for each of our professions.
For coaching, the question expands from “Who am I becoming?” to “What am I helping to create?” For mentoring, experience becomes something to examine rather than simply transmit: what deserves to be carried forward, what needs to be unlearned, and what has yet to be invented? And in team coaching, the client is not merely a collection of individuals but an emergent system nested within wider organisational and societal systems.
At the centre of the paper is a practical framework, the Six Questions of Generative Responsibility, inviting reflection through six lenses: Self, Relationship, System, Purpose, Impact and Future. It can be used in contracting, coaching conversations, mentoring, team reflection and supervision.
The paper is not an argument for making every problem systemic. Sometimes an individual capability or behaviour really is the appropriate level of intervention. The discipline is more precise:
Work at the narrowest level that is sufficient, but no narrower.
Ultimately, the invitation is to reconsider the developmental question itself. Questions like: How can I become more successful, resilient or effective? become:
What are we becoming capable of creating together, and is it a future worth creating?
We invite coaches, mentors, team coaches, supervisors, leaders and organisational development professionals to read the full white paper and to continue the conversation about how our professions can strengthen personal agency without losing sight of relationships, systems, power, purpose, impact and future generations.